Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Lycaon

Photobucket

Here is a picture of a freshly transformed Lycaon. You may notice the blood seeping under his hand. Some have claimed this is the blood of his first victim. As he howled into the night, fleeing through the underbrush, steam from his molten breath. Growling, grunting as he scrapes his arm on a branch. The intensity of the pain shocks him, but doesn't deter. He is hungry. So hungry for human flesh. Humming, humming, humming. A woman stumbles into the cool night air. Spinning in cirlces after a lovely date. Smiling, the world perfectly happy. BAM! Lycaon lunges on her, transforming her into a newt with his magical voodoo stick. Grabbing the squiggling creature in his canine palm, he licks it. Yum, tastes like amphibian. Ym ym. He pours katchup on it, his lips wet with anticipation. He eats it. Yum. And that's the story of Lycaon right after the transformation.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Ovid's Imaginary Life

Wow. An Imaginary Life was quite the book. At first I thought the first-person, poetical dialogue would grow old. There wasn't a single sentence of dialogue in the entire book, and it's somewhat amazing that I became attached to the characters at all. But I did, and I liked it. Especially near the end. One of the closest attachments to Ovid's Metamorphesis would have to be the theme of change. In An Imaginary Life, everything is always changing. The seasons, Ovid himself as he lives with the natives progressively longer, and especially the Child as he transforms into some sort of animal-human chimera. An animal caged inside mankind's world. There was a particular quote that I really enjoyed. It went something to effect of death is just giving up on the constant change of life.

There also seemed to be an overarching theme of destiny. Ovid, even though he didn't know it when he was young, was always marching to the ends of the known world. It was his destiny, and the universe was always nudging him toward whether he knew it or not. Reminds me of the television show LOST. Anyway, you could go on for hours about how this relates to class. Another obvious example would be the relationship between men and women. Women being the mysterious gender, and men the less mysterious. I don't know if this view comes from the author being a man. Perhaps if the author was a woman it would be the reverse.

Fictional Ovid discusses the Child like he had met him before in Salma (that word is very wrong, but I know it begins with an "s"). I am a little confused still on the context of this statement. Does it have to do with the Child being a metaphor for his own youth and innocence before he entered the world of men? Ovid looked on the Child nostalgically, reminding him of his own childhood. I have to wonder if the whole entire story wasn't just a metaphor for lost innocence, and the need to return to that innocence (afterall, it is called the Imaginary Life). The Child also appears to represent nature and is ONE with it. Does this relates to man's desire to be at peace with oneself? Is this story trying to reconcile man's desire to be free of nature and also be ONE with it? What is the relationship between childhood and nature? What the hell did I really just read?

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Blame Lycon

Wow, the story of Lycon goes from highs to lows. Starts out sorta beautiful with the creation of earth. Its very lovely and everything is happy and good. Sunrises and sunsets and pretty little flowers and Lucy Lui's smiling face, then BAM! Everything goes to hell and humanity is massacred in a pretty cool genocide. Why did those old guys love floods so much? Seriously, Gilgamesh, Ovid, the Old Testament. But what the hey? I love genocide as much as the next guy. Haha... No. That's for the New World Order... or Cylons... or frankly, both. I could totally see being eliminated by Cylons in the future.

Anyway, you can blame humanity's mass drowning on Lycon, the first werewolf. Jupiter and his cronies sit on some high mountain discussing how much humans suck hardcore, oh so hardcore, we all hate humans, kill! kill! kill! Jupiter bellows with his mighty muzzle, "And this one time I was walkin around earth, you know like I do? I was in man form, cuz you know. Then I showed up at Lycon's party and everyone bowed cuz I showed them my signal. But that Lycon dude didn't believe me. What a dick!" murmurings of agreement from the other gods. "Yeah, I know. So Lycon grabs one of his servants behind my back, slits his throat, then, oh you are not going to believe this, my gods, he tries to disguise the corpse and feed it to me!" gasps. "Yeah guys, I know, humans suck hardcore! I told you. And so I zap him with a lightning bolt. It goes through his body. And don't laugh, but his hair was all staticy like when you put your head against something fuzzy. Then get this, he tries to run, but he turns into wolf. Oh gods, humanity sure does suck. Let's kill them all." Yeah you're right. Kill them all.

So there you go, the story of Lycon. Jupiter uses it for his justification when he drowns humanity in one HUMONGOUS flood. Lycon? Where have I heard that before? Oh that's right: those terrible underworld movies with all the werewolves. I guess they are not terrible, just bland. But bland is worse than terrible. You can't even laugh at it. It's just there.

What I found the most interesting is that there are no survivors. You though Jehovah was bad! The gods just kill humanity. That's right: There no Noah! Or that one dude in Gilgamesh, I don't remember his name! It's just pure destruction. The Romans were kind of downers. I mean, the other guys at least gave humanity a chance. Nah, the Romans kill us all. (One more thing: Jehovah is similar to Jove. And Bachus is similar to Jesus. Then you start seeing connections all over the place.)

Speaking of awesome. That Battlestar finale was really good.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Helen whose daughter?

Like many ancient Greek characters, there seems to be some confusion on what Helen's actual parentage is. In the article Helen of Troy - Heroine or Goddess?, Karen Pierce concludes that her origins were influenced by Euripides. Leda is often attributed as Helen's mother, but this only came after the playwrite's works. Earlier, it appeared it was Nemesis who was the mother. The stories are very similar:

Pierce: "Commonly referred to as the Goddess of Retribution, ... Zeus also raped Nemesis, and thus Helen was born. In Greek mythology it is not unusual that Zeus should rape his own daughter, he does after all live in marriage with his own sister. This rape, however, caused shame and indignation for Nemesis, and she attempted to flee Zeus' advances by shape-changing into many different creatures, as he pursued her (see Cypria - Athenaeus 8.334B). Zeus finally caught up with her when she was in the form of a goose, and he a swan. After the rape, Nemesis subsequently gave birth to an egg from which Helen eventually hatched. The egg was found and brought to Leda who brought up Helen as her own daughter."

The more well known origin, of course, is that of Zeus descending from the heavens and raping Leda in the form of swan. Personally, neither are very appealing. Sure it's not Cannibal Holocaust or 100 Days of Sodom, but a god descending from the heavens and raping a woman? That has to be terrifying, and calls into question why the Greeks worshipped such a terrifying figure. And a woman laying an egg? Disturbing stuff. One wonders if the movie series "Alien" didn't recall some of this stuff. For the uninitiated, the aliens would attach themselves to a human and implant an egg inside their body. The guy or gal would then wake up oky-doky with the parasite-alien incubating inside their guts. Later, the beast would burst from the chest, squeak, sneer, and run off. To add to this, art depicting Leda shows her being horrified by what she wrought. Pierce: "The pictures that depict Leda with an egg show her discovering it, and often looking surprised or shocked (she sometimes even runs away from the scene). Helen is sometimes shown emerging from the egg as a miniature human, rather than as a baby. "

Pierce concludes, "Although Leda is the traditionally known mother of Helen it is highly probable that the Nemesis version is of older origin.
Prior to Euripides' Helen there is no evidence of Leda having been raped by Zeus in the form of a swan. In fact there does not appear to be any rape story at all associated with Leda and the birth of Helen, until we reach Euripides. This is in contrast to the myth attached to Leda's bearing of the Dioscuri (see Homeric Hymn to the Dioscuri ). Iconographically Leda is seen finding the egg prior to Euripides, and afterwards she is depicted with a swan.
With the Nemesis version of the myth established Helen is revealed to have two divine parents, and thus should be regarded as divine herself.
If Leda does have any valid claim to be her mother, then Helen is the only mortal daughter of Zeus, this is significant in its exceptionality."

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Sense of Nonsense

I think this really relates to what we are talking about in class. It deals with making sense out of nonsense and why we love music, dancing, and jumblings of words, just like James Joyce. Alan Watts rocks.
The Sense of Nonsense

I also found this site kinda funny. It's the top 8 worse Greek God punishments:
Top 8 Greek God Punishments

Some interesting Greek sayings:
Greek Sayings